At this 12 months’s SCCE Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute in Nashville, LRN joined greater than a thousand compliance and ethics professionals for per week of perception and collaboration. Along with the packed agenda of classes and panels, our presence prolonged throughout the convention ground and past. Our sales space turned a hub of dialog, Sunday night time’s gross sales dinner rapidly reached capability, and our night at Pete’s Dueling Piano Bar reminded everybody that even compliance professionals know methods to increase the amount when the music begins in Historic Downtown Nashville.
But amid the dinners and dueling pianos, there was the work. These had been the conversations from the stage the place our Advisory specialists pressed on the actual questions going through compliance at the moment. What does a Code of Conduct seem like when it’s constructed for individuals fairly than binders? Can the sector of compliance admit that a few of its sacred cows corresponding to annual coaching and gamified quizzes are maybe previous their prime? And the way do you present a regulator that your program is greater than paper?
Rethinking the code of conduct with Ty Francis
Ty Francis, Chief Advisory Officer at LRN, led a session titled “Your Code of Conduct is Stale: Easy methods to Refresh Your Code, Present Information to Your Board and Have interaction with Your Staff.” His level was sharp: too many organizations deal with their Code like wallpaper, seen however hardly seen. He urged compliance leaders to see the Code as one thing alive, woven into every day operations and designed to encourage values-driven habits.
Efficient Codes, Ty defined, must be shorter, extra accessible, and constructed for the realities of at the moment’s workforce. Video, embedded hyperlinks, and information reinforcement could make them related once more. The actual problem, he famous, shouldn’t be attain however engagement.
Key takeaways:
- 85% of Codes at the moment usually are not accounting for AI.
- 32% of corporations nonetheless solely supply web-based Codes, limiting interactivity.
- Multilingual, recurrently up to date, and customized Codes resonate extra deeply throughout a various workforce
He closed with a reminder that the most effective Codes lead with values, not guidelines, giving workers a framework to information real-world decision-making.
Debating Unpopular Opinions with Meredith Hunt
Meredith Hunt, Ethics & Compliance Advisor at LRN, joined Cricket Synder (Jefferson County Fee) and Virginia MacSuibhne (Alumis) for what may need been probably the most animated session of the week: “Compliance Conflict: Debating Unpopular Opinions and Rising Tendencies.” Moderated by Shannon Jamison (KARL STORZ), the session broke away from the same old panel format. It was half debate, half actuality examine, and at moments felt like group remedy for compliance officers prepared to say what others solely suppose.
The panelists surfaced a collection of provocative opinions that challenged standard knowledge and sparked rapid dialogue throughout the room:
Related articles
Annual coaching is ineffective, and gamification is outdated.
Threat assessments grow to be a threat themselves when decreased to a spreadsheet.
You can’t coverage your approach out of cultural issues.
Compliance shouldn’t be an approval perform.
Every level opened the ground to full of life exchanges, with some attendees nodding in settlement and others bristling on the suggestion. That rigidity was precisely the aim. By leaning into disagreement, the session inspired individuals to rethink the effectiveness of long-standing practices and ask whether or not compliance applications are actually designed for affect or just custom.
What made the dialogue stand out was its willingness to confront uncomfortable truths with humor and honesty. Somewhat than presenting straightforward options, the panel invited professionals to suppose critically about the place compliance ought to evolve subsequent. In doing so, it created an area the place candid dialogue might transfer the career ahead.
Adapting to Regulatory Shifts with Eric Morehead
Eric Morehead, Vice President of Advisory Providers at LRN, led a session titled “Regulatory Expectations in a Altering Setting.” His message was simple: insurance policies on paper are not sufficient. Regulators need proof that compliance applications really work, and firms have to be ready to indicate it.
Key takeaways:
Regulators anticipate proof, not guarantees.
Flexibility is essential as priorities and legal guidelines shift.
Boards want clear insights that present compliance is strengthening tradition and lowering threat.
The takeaway was clear. Packages that stay inflexible will falter, whereas those who adapt, measure outcomes, and exhibit affect will thrive.
Trying forward
SCCE 2025 was per week that underscored the worth of bringing the compliance group collectively to share insights, problem assumptions, and look forward to what comes subsequent. From the regular buzz of conversations at our sales space, to the total tables at dinner and the piano sing-alongs downtown, to the thought management shared from the stage, LRN’s presence mirrored our dedication to serving to organizations construct moral cultures that thrive in a altering world. We left Nashville energized by the dialogue, impressed by the group, and able to carry that momentum into the 12 months forward.
