I do know that the channel between two friends may be both introduced or unannounced. Nevertheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the stability of the channel just isn’t revealed. So far as I do know, it is a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer choose out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the stability to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s stability reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may gain advantage economically by doing so.
As an illustration, a big LN node belonging to an alternate could be very prone to conform to this. They’d acquire extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness considerations since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this is able to be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s principally promoting your data to realize extra money.
I do know that the channel between two friends may be both introduced or unannounced. Nevertheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the stability of the channel just isn’t revealed. So far as I do know, it is a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer choose out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the stability to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s stability reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may gain advantage economically by doing so.
As an illustration, a big LN node belonging to an alternate could be very prone to conform to this. They’d acquire extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness considerations since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this is able to be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s principally promoting your data to realize extra money.
